| Frequently
asked questions about Print
Washers How does
the Versalab archival print washer compare to other washers as far
as water flow is concerned?
A fascinating
question. The issue of water use seems to have become something
of a decision point in the choice of archival washer purchase, and
we think that this is marketing nonsense not logic or science.
There
are several parts to the answer.
Firstly,
any well designed washer will have nearly the same real water flow
requirement and wash time. The total amount of water necessary to
adequately dilute print-born fixer is not very great. The capacity
of our washer is nearly enough dilution water by itself without
additional flowing water through it. The main use of the water flow
is to create a small amount of agitation and keep the water in the
tank well mixed. The basic performance information we supply takes
into account that some folks will not test their results - we therefore
quote what we consider to be conservative numbers. The washer can
be used at flows as low as .25-.3 GPM (1-1.5 liters/min.) and can
get good results in 20 minutes.
Secondly,
the most important elements to water use and wash time have to do
with the water itself (the temperature and pH) and what you have
done to the print before it gets to the washer. Pulling a print
out of the fixer and placing it straight into the washer is the
worst possible case. Rinse the print off in a tray of water first.
Better yet use adequate hypo clearing treatment with a rinse beforehand.
Then, if water use is critical where you live use rapid fix. The
savings in water use from best to worst case can be as high as six
to one!
Lastly,
is water use really a problem where you live? We ourselves hate
to see water wasted, but the water used for print washing by most
photographers is a tiny amount of the water use of their household,
and costs very little. A more important priority is making sure
that the prints are washed, and that you don't spend more money
on the washer (and its maintenance) than the water is worth.
|